Let me tell you about a man named Joe, although that was almost certainly not his real name. It was a common moniker to men of his station and status, much in the same way a black man in the south might have been called George by a white man. No one took the trouble to learn the name, and just as often no trouble was taken to give it. I discovered “Joe” while reading a 46-year-old account of a woman in reference to one of the most well-known events of the late 19th century, particularly in New England.
|Marion Hicks Campbell's Letter is published in "Mysterious New England"|
Before I can tell you about Joe, let me tell you about Marion Hicks Campbell. She is the only person to ever mention him in a public context. This is what she did in a letter written to Yankee Magazine in response to an article that appeared in August of 1966. Only a little more is known about Marion Hicks Campbell than is known about Joe. She may be the author of one of two books historical sketches on Old Dartmouth and Bedford, published before World War II. The art of her letter writing suggests a familiarity with storytelling. Unfortunately, Marion Hicks Campbell does not give a date to the event she narrates in the letter. But, she states it was over half a century, and as the letter to Yankee Magazine was dated November 16th 1966, this would place the events of her meeting and what it revealed sometime in 1916, at the latest.
So, sometime in 1916 or earlier, somewhere in Massachusetts, Marion had stopped one evening at a farm in a county adjoining the one in which she resided. She asked the owner about the best squash varieties to plant in her own garden. The farmer was kind enough to show her around his operation while his wife cleaned up from their recent supper.
|Turn-of-the Century New England Farm|
During the tour, an “oldish” man hurried
by them carrying a pail of scraps for the chickens. The farmer commented on him casually as a “a man who belongs on a chicken farm. But it would never work. He could feed the biddies and collect eggs, but he couldn’t kill a chicken for market if his life depended on it.” Marion Hicks Campbell described him as one with a gentle face, and an anxious expression in faded blue eyes. She was curious about him, and the farmer had a tale he could tell. He said, “Joe, I call all my men Joe no matter what their name is, he’s been worse than he is today (referring to his nervousness). But he says he’ll be better now.”
Every night, Joe would sit at the table with his employers after supper and talk about their days. Joe would slink off to read the daily paper and then head to bed (farmhands rise before dawn after all). The week before, he had become agitated and jittery after reading the paper. The only article of note the farmer could find that might have set him off was on what had long since been regarded as the most notorious murders in New England History, and possibly America altogether. Having a good relationship with his employer, Joe unburdened himself of the story, and now the farmer was the one who was agitated, not knowing what should be done about what he now knew of Joe. Marion Hicks Campbell offered to help bear that responsibility. This was what the farmer told her.
|19th Century Fall River was among one of the wealthiest cities in Massachusetts.|
Joe had been born the runt of a large family with an old New England name. The family ran a farm, but Joe was unable to take part much in that life, on account of being too “spleeny” and weak to perform anything by light farm work. This made him a target or ridicule for his siblings. He didn’t excel in school either, and by no account could he be called an educated man. But at age 21, his father gave him a small sum of money, and Joe set out the nearest city to seek his fortune. This was the in the closing decades of the 19th century, and the city was Fall River, Massachusetts.
Some of you probably have an idea where this story is going now.
Joe was a simple young man who made his way honestly, and benefited from the kindness of his new community. While he wasn’t strong enough for regular farm labor, there was always work for an “odd jobs” man in those days. He kept his living expenses low, and found work where he might sleep in a spare room and eat kitchen leftovers. He was well liked, trusted and did well for himself. The letter goes on to reveal Joe as a man of feeling and morality as well.
Joe worked frequently at 92 Second Street, not far from the Fall River Business District. The house was home to the small, moderately wealthy Borden family consisting of an elderly businessman named Andrew, his second wife Abby, his daughters Emma and Elizabeth “Lizzie”, and an Irish maid named Bridget Sullivan, whom the family called “Maggie”. Events in that house on the sweltering day of August 4, 1892 are both well documented and an enduring mystery. Here is what we know.
Andrew left the house at around 9:00am that morning, leaving his wife Abby and Lizzie (32) (both she and older sister Emma (41) were spinsters and daughters of Andrew’s first wife, now 30-years dead) alone with Maggie. Emma was some 15 miles away in Fairhaven, visiting friends. The Bordens had hosted a guest the night before, an uncle called Mr. Morse, who had since left the house. There has never been any evidence that showed either Emma or Mr. Morse were anywhere near the house during the next two hours.
|Andrew and Abby Borden|
It was known that the Borden family, perhaps stemming from Andrew Borden’s known-stinginess and a recent incident of burglary, was very careful about bolts and door locks. The house was nearly impossible to break into without a key, and the interior was devoid of hiding places. The front door was even bolted and double-locked that morning behind Andrew. Abby was upstairs cleaning the room in which Mr. Morse had slept in. Maggie was washing windows and Lizzie was about her business, reportedly engaged in several different activities.
Andrew returned home somewhere between 10:30-11:00am and was admitted by Maggie. Lizzie sat with her father in the sitting room, helped him out of his shoes, and told him that her stepmother had received a note to go see someone in town who was ill, though Lizzie said she didn’t know who it was. About 10 minutes later, Andrew Borden lay down on his couch in the sitting room to nap. This was a regular habit. Maggie, exhausted from window washing, went to her own rooms to rest, while Lizzie went to the barn to search for “fishing line sinkers to be used on a holiday the next week”. Other accounts reference that she was eating pears in the barn or the backyard.
|Andrew Borden murdered on the couch where he napped.|
During this time, someone took a single-edged weapon, probably a hatchet, and struck Andrew Borden 11 times in the head while he slept on the couch. One blow literally split his eyeball in two. Maggie was alerted to this when Lizzie yelled up to her from the sitting room, asking her to come quickly, “Someone has killed father”. Maggie ran across the street to a neighbor’s house who was also a doctor. Finding him not home, she ran further down to bring Lizzie’s friend Alice Russell. It was during this period of activity in the house, that Lizzie “became anxious about her stepmother”, and that Abby’s body was found in the guest bedroom with 19 similar blows to the head. Blood had congealed around the body, and it was later concluded by authorities that her death had preceded her husband’s for up to an hour.
|Abby Borden murdered while cleaning the guest room.|
From there, things get rather muddy. Lizzie soon became the prime suspect, though had no blood on her. I’ve read different accounts of evidence against Lizzie, almost all circumstantial. She appeared calm throughout the commotion. She spoke sharply to a policeman when he asked her about her mother, stating that Abby was not her mother, but stepmother. That she slept in the house that night, although the idea was that an axe murder might still be on the loose, and perhaps inside the house. A day before she became an official suspect, she burned a dress in the stove, saying it had been ruined by paint. Her rooms and belongings were not searched until several days after the murders. I’ve read that a police officer, on duty watching the house the night following the slayings saw Lizzie go down to the cellar to use the privy and return with a bucket full of bloody clothes that he assumed were just menstrual napkins.
History also questions Lizzie’s general character. She is sometimes written as mild-mannered, and was an active church member (though this has never made one incapable of committing crime). Other accounts color her as a known sneak thief and shoplifter, who hungered for luxury and suffered under her father’s supposed frugality. Despite being a wealthy family, the Bordens occupied a neighborhood filled with many of the poor gentility of Fall Rivers, which was considered a wealthy town in those days. Their house was modest compared to the neighborhood of The Hill, just a mile or so away, and a place in which they could have well afford to live. It’s also suggested that the Borden sisters’ poor prospects of marriage and spinsterhood is due to living in a neighborhood beneath them.
The Borden household was not supposed to have been happy. The sisters called their Stepmother only by the name Mrs. Borden. They didn’t take meals together. The door separating the girls’ upstairs bedrooms from their parents was always locked. They received guests in their own parts of the house. There is even a report that Lizzie kept pigeons at one time, which her father, deciding they were unwanted, dispatched with a hatchet.
|1893 coverage of the Lizzie Borden trial|
Speaking of the hatchet, no murder weapon was ever really identified. A hatchet head was found in the barn, but, though it fit into the skull holes in Andrew and Abby’s skull, it couldn’t be positively identified as THE murder weapon. This combined with no physical evidence, evidence rendered inadmissible, and strong Victorian values held by the all-male jury, helped Lizzie Borden acquittal of the murders after a 13-day trial. Seems as though the men of Fall River couldn’t conceive of a young, respectable woman, so like their own daughter, killing her parents with such savagery.
But, what does this have to do with our itinerate laborer Joe? To me, that is the most interesting part of the story. According to the farmer (remember the farm where Marion Hicks Campbell heard the story? Follow me back there), our odd job man Joe had taken a shine to Miss Lizzie Borden. The farmer had even used the phrase “fallen in love”. Seems he identified with Lizzie, she being disliked in her family as he had been in his own. She was dominant and strong where he was shy and weak, and he called her a “good looker”.
It appears as though our young man Joe would do just about anything to please Miss Lizzie Borden. Did this include unknowingly helping her get away with murder? I’ve never read any testimony that places Joe, or anyone of his description at the house that day, but according to the story that was told to the farmer, Joe was there in the morning doing small yard chores, specifically raking litter (yard waste) and loading it into a the Borden’s wheelbarrow for disposal at a nearby site used for such. Here I will quote directly from the letter.
“Lizzie came to the kitchen door and beckoned him over. She was wiping off a hatchet with a piece of rag. She handed him the hatchet and told him to put it in the barn. He saw nothing strange about the request, or about her wiping it off. Everyone wiped off tools in those days to keep them in good condition. Tools cost money and money was scarce.
“She tossed the rag into the midst of the litter in the barrel and then said ‘wait, I’ve got something else to throw away.’ She went into the house and handed him a small bundle wrapped in paper and tied with a string. He put the hatchet in the barn and the bundle in the wheelbarrow, and was soon trudging his load down the street to a lot where fill was needed. He felt proud that he could show Miss Lizzie that he could handle a man-sized load, even though it was light.
“After he dumped the stuff, he had to rest awhile [and eat] . . . When he had eaten he took the wheelbarrow back to the Borden barn . . . He noticed people going in and out of the house more than usual. . . ’Abby and Andrew Borden have been murdered,” replied a woman to whom he’d asked about the situation. “With a hatchet,” she added, though she could hardly speak for crying.
Joe felt sick and slumped down. He had liked the Bordens and couldn’t believe they had been murdered. He thought, in his simple way, that if someone was going around killing with a hatchet, he’d better hide the Borden hatchet out of site. He didn’t want any more murders. Joe went back to the barn and hid the hatchet Lizzie had given him. It was only then that he thought about his encounter with Lizzie that morning. He was sure she couldn’t do such a thing.
But now he was frightened. He stumbled out of the yard, afraid that policemen would question him, and returned to the rubbish lot. But in the time since he’d dumped his load, others had dumped loads as well, burying the bundle and rag too far down to be retrieved. Joe took it as a sign that he should mind his business. He felt confident that police would find the murderer. He went about his work, feeling sick at heart. After Lizzie Borden’s acquittal, he couldn’t stand to stay in Fall River any longer, afraid he would meet her by chance.
Joe didn’t tell much of his life after that to the farmer, but he gathered that Joe had become a drifter. He wandered from town to town, doing what work he could. He slept in haymows in summer, and tried for warm dairy barns in the winter. He never stayed long in any place, but said people were always good to him.
|The skulls of Abby and Andrew Borden, and the head of a hatchet found on the property are on display to this day in Fall River, MA|
Now, the farmer was worried over what to do about Joe. The story he had been told weighed heavily on him, and he thought he should tell the police. But all that Borden business had happened so long ago, and it would probably kill Joe to be harassed by reporters and police now. He told Marion Hicks Campbell that he was going to ask a friend of the family who was a judge for his advice on the matter.
The matter was never discussed with the judge. That night, perhaps with his ears burning, Joe packed his few belongings and left the farm. He might have caught a boxcar to the Midwest, or boarded a packet on the coast. He might have slipped away to the woods and joined the pickers in the cranberry bogs. Who knows?
Who knows who Joe was, if he was some drifter who had a powerful imagination and invented the story, or if Marion Hicks Campbell, or the farmer were the ones with the imagination? Who knows if Lizzie Borden really did murder her parents with a hatchet that August day in 1892.
If she did, she hardly benefited from it. Though she and sister Emma inherited an estate of over $125,000 and bought a mansion in the fashionable district of The Hill, they lived as pariahs. Both were scorned by Fall River society and Lizzie died alone in 1927, along with her secrets. She joins the ranks of Jack the Ripper and the Villisca axe murderer, something we can never be sure about. Today, the Borden House at 92 Second Street is a bed and breakfast, immensely popular with those who have macabre fascinations or continued interests in the case. For my part, I would love to know what happened to the man called Joe.
What do you think?